Like exploring a stay
Airbnb brings the place, relevant details, and cost into the same decision experience.
Modesto Aesthetics & Laser
A connected patient experience brings treatment information, affordability, and a next step together. Modesto’s results show payment choice in use; the AI concept below shows how that experience can begin with a question.
A useful starting point, even when the patient is still researching.
Explore treatment information, then discuss suitability and a plan with the practice.
Understand pricing and available ways to pay while considering the treatment.
Interest does not always arrive ready for a booking form. Give it somewhere useful to continue.
Conversation connects with discovery so patients can explore what they are asking about.
Payment information belongs where patients are considering the decision.
Modesto Aesthetics & Laser serves patients throughout California’s Central Valley. The practice offers injectables, laser procedures, body contouring, hair restoration, skin rejuvenation, and medical-grade skincare.
Patients may be exploring one service or a longer-term plan. The team emphasizes consultation, education, and recommendations shaped around individual goals.
Through Instapaytient, Modesto introduced Affirm as part of its purchasing process. Eligible patients can review financing while considering the recommended treatments, keeping cost and care in the same conversation.
Understand the proposed treatments, appointments, and commitment.
Consider how the upfront amount and payment options fit.
Questions + treatment information + affordability + a way forward.
The workflow is described in the supplied case. The AI interaction is illustrative, not evidence of Modesto’s deployed AI workflow.
They are exploring treatments, comparing practices, and thinking about cost. Those questions can shape whether they ever make contact.
If useful answers and affordability information only appear after a consultation, they cannot help the person still deciding whether to book one.
Instapaytient’s purpose is to join that earlier decision: helping patients ask, explore, understand, and continue with the practice.
Help patients understand the commitment while they are still deciding what to do next.
Ask questions and explore the practice’s treatment information.
Review pricing and available payment options in context.
Continue with the provider to confirm suitability and the plan.
Find a clear path to the practice’s next step.
Conceptual journey. The care recommendation remains with the provider; payment options depend on availability, eligibility, and terms.
That continuity is familiar in travel and other significant purchases. Patient experiences can be built around it, too.
Airbnb brings the place, relevant details, and cost into the same decision experience.
Expedia gives people an experience for exploring choices and understanding a larger commitment.
Instapaytient connects questions, treatments, affordability, and next steps—with the clinical team guiding care.
Consumer-experience analogies only. No affiliation with Airbnb or Expedia is implied.
A useful answer can connect to a treatment to explore. Treatment information can connect to pricing and affordability. That context can connect to a clear next step with the practice.
Affirm is the financing provider in the example below. The platform story is the connection between discovery, affordability, and action—not the financing brand itself. The same design principle can apply to other supported payment options; it is not a claim that every lender is currently integrated.
Instapaytient supported $83,929 in treatment plan sales across card payments and Affirm. More than half of completed orders used the financing option.
Total treatment plan sales through Instapaytient
Treatment plans financed through Affirm
Affirm-financed treatment plan sales
Financing was the payment path for 57.9% of plans sold in the sample.
Card: 53 · 42.1% | Affirm: 73 · 57.9%
Card: $40,734.50 | Affirm: $43,194.50
Compared with 53 plans paid by card.
The results show financing adoption within the purchasing experience. They do not measure how many of those orders would otherwise have been lost.
| Metric | Reported result |
|---|---|
| Total treatment plans sold | 126 |
| Total treatment plan sales | $83,929 |
| Average treatment plan value | $666.10 |
| Card-paid treatment plans | 53 · 42.1% |
| Card treatment plan sales | $40,734.50 · 48.5% |
| Average card treatment plan value | $768.58 |
| Affirm-financed treatment plans | 73 · 57.9% |
| Affirm treatment plan sales | $43,194.50 · 51.5% |
| Average Affirm treatment plan value | $591.71 |
Source: Modesto Aesthetics & Laser case-study figures supplied to Instapaytient. Treatment plans sold refers to completed orders in the fixed analyzed sample, not necessarily unique patients or completed clinical care. This is not necessarily all practice revenue.
The illustrative AI experience above is a presentation concept, not a screenshot or evidence of Modesto’s deployed AI workflow. The transaction sample does not establish AI-driven conversion lift, incremental patients, higher spending caused by financing, or clinical outcomes. No formal Affirm-specific patient feedback was reported.
Counts, sales, averages, and percentage shares use the supplied dataset, with rounding. The case demonstrates payment-option adoption, rather than a measured before-and-after comparison.
The opportunity is larger than another way to pay.
Give interested patients the context and experience to see a way forward.